my king The Daily Beast’s newsletter for everything related to the royal family and the royal family. Subscription over here To get it in your inbox every Sunday.
Concern is growing about the content of Prince Harry’s memoirs in the royal family’s inner circle, with a source telling The Daily Beast that a particular chapter of the book could cause “a big problem” for King Charles.
The royal insider told The Daily Beast: “There’s one chapter in particular that could cause Charles a huge problem.” However, they did not say what is the revelation in detail in the respective chapter.
The source said their understanding is that the book is still likely to be published on its original schedule before the end of the year. Publishing house Random House did not respond to a request for comment on the case, but its website still says the book will be released “late” this year.
The palace declined to comment to the Daily Beast about the allegations regarding the book, or to say whether the King’s office had access to Harry’s manuscript.
New rumors swirling around the book are likely to cause concern at the palace after another week of intense activity for Harry and Meghan Markle, and as the palace prepares for a brutal media attack, with more podcasts from Archewell, a new series of… the crown (The new trailer released Thursday) The Meghan and Harry show on Netflix and Harry’s book is expected to drop between now and Christmas.
While the courtiers are somewhat optimistic about both the crown (It seems that the simple message of “it’s made-up” permeates at least locally) And as Meghan’s promised Netflix documentary series “The Couple’s Love Story” will explore Harry’s book, Harry’s book is seen as a different threatening arrangement.
It might be easy to see why.
Meghan’s credibility was severely damaged by the comments she made In an interview with shearingAnd the Including saying that she was told that her wedding was hailed in South Africa as an event of equal significance to Nelson Mandela’s release. In an interview with Soft Soap diverse Posted this week, she said her mistake was being too “trusting” with the journalist in question.
light weight diverse The interview, in which she praised the late Queen Elizabeth and did not arrest members of the royal family, was seen by some as a sign that her attacks on the palace might be receding.
“It’s interesting that when she’s not ditching the royal family, Meghan doesn’t have a lot of interest to say.“
– Royal family friend
One source, who is a family friend, told The Daily Beast: ‘It’s interesting that when she’s not ditching the royal family, Meghan doesn’t care much to say. There was nothing in the [Variety] An interview that would upset members of the royal family. If that’s the tone that the Netflix show is going to take, I think it might be less problematic for the family than it was supposed to. The worst could end.”
Valentine Lou, author of a book Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown The royal editor of the London newspaper timesAnd the She told The Daily Beast: ‘It was really interesting that Meghan was in it diverse The interview, it was very conciliatory. She spoke warmly of the Queen and was definitely not a controversy. I think that can be taken as an encouraging sign that, ultimately, they are moving forward and looking to the future.”
But if Meghan says all she has to say, the perception is that Harry definitely didn’t.
The indifference with which palace insiders now view Meghan’s attacks contrasts markedly with the warning that the prospect of Harry attacking the monarchy continues to excite him.
Harry, of course, is the ultimate insider, and it would be impossible for the Palace to ignore his first-hand account of the breakdown of his parents’ marriage with a difference in the Queen’s stinging line after allegations of racism in an Oprah interview that, “Some memories may differ.”
It is interesting that Lou told The Daily Beast that he was aware of a meeting between Harry and a private person (not a palace staff member) while Harry was in London. The person kindly suggested to Harry that he might go easy on his family in the book, but, Law says, “Harry wasn’t very receptive to the idea.”
It seems likely that the book will explore the story of Harry’s trauma and his mental health. In fact, Harry used his appearance at the conference on Wednesday night (in support of Betterup, the mental health training company for which he serves as chief effects officer) to launch a new attack on Britain’s royal family for neglecting his mental health, saying he had never heard that word. The “treatment” when he was a working member of the royal family, in what could easily be interpreted as criticism of the monarchy for failing to look after his mental health and that of his wife.
This has always been a reason for Harry and Meghan’s anger: Meghan told Oprah Winfrey that when she contacted staff at the palace for mental health support, she was told to drop the idea because it would reflect badly on the establishment. She said she contemplated suicide.
She later said on one of her last podcasts that it was Harry who found her a therapist.
Harry told Oprah it was Meghan who encouraged him to get treatment, although he previously told journalist Bryony Gordon, In podcast 2017 It was recorded shortly after he met Meghan that he underwent treatment at the request of friends and other people including his brother William.
As always with the Sussexes, even if the details are somewhat muddled, the big picture is clear: They believe the royals have shown an arrogant disregard for their well-being. It seemed like they wanted revenge, but whether the book could really deal Charles a fatal blow is the big debate now.
Loew, for example, is not convinced that even the fierce influxes of a despised second son could seriously impede the general progress of the monarchy.
“While Harry could certainly reveal harmful discoveries… I think it is highly unlikely that his book will be definitively harmful to the King or the Royal Family.“
– valentine’s day low
He said, “While Harry can certainly reveal malicious discoveries and produce days or even weeks of headlines, and metaphors being thrown around for years to come, I think it is highly unlikely that his book will be definitively detrimental to the King or the royal family. You only need To look at “Tampungat” When Charles was recorded making the most embarrassing phone call (with Camilla, I imagined it was a tampon—revealed to the world in 1993), you can probably imagine it. He survived it, and indeed, married Camilla and she is now a queen.”
While it likely wouldn’t be in Harry’s long-term interest to reveal something so devastating that it would force the king to abdicate (even if he had the receipts), so is their ability to harm members of the royal family, whether they like it or not. It is the most valuable product.
“Netflix doesn’t care about Meghan’s pursuit of social justice. They just want to know if James Hewitt is Harry’s father.“
– Media Officer
As one media executive told The Daily Beast, “Netflix doesn’t care about Meghan’s pursuit of social justice. They just want to know if James Hewitt is Harry’s father.”
They might think otherwise, but it was the Sussexes’ insider knowledge of the secrets of the world’s most powerful family that secured them the lucrative media contracts that now fund their multi-million dollar lifestyles.
How far Harry is prepared to go to satisfy his commercial payers is the question that keeps some in the palace up at night.
[ad_2]
